Key result
Impulse conduction disorders identify interatrial septal anomalies more reliably than clinical signs, ~85% vs ~30%.
Why the study?
Are interatrial septal abnormalities associated with cardiac impulse conduction disorders in adult patients?
Observational (n=53)
No
Are interatrial septal abnormalities associated with cardiac impulse conduction disorders in adult patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 84.91% vs 30.19%
p-value: p=0.002
Interatrial septal anomalies are highly associated with impulse conduction disorders, particularly right bundle branch block, which may serve as an early indicator of these structural abnormalities.
Conduction disorders may warrant echocardiography for septal anomalies over symptoms; Level 4 data leave open prospective validation.
INTERATRIAL SEPTAL DISORDERS, WHICH INCLUDE: atrial septal defect, patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysm, are frequent congenital anomalies found in adult patients. Early detection of these anomalies is important to prevent their hemodynamic and/or thromboembolic consequences. The aims of this study were: to assess the association between impulse conduction disorders and anomalies of interatrial septum; to determine the prevalence of different types of interatrial septum abnormalities; to assess anatomic, hemodynamic, and clinical consequences of interatrial septal pathologies. Fifty-three adult patients with impulse conduction disorders and patients without ECG changes but with signs of interatrial septal abnormalities, who were referred to our center for echocardiography, were included in a prospective transesophageal echocardiography study. Interatrial septal anomalies were detected in around 85% of the examined patients. Patent foramen ovale was encountered in 32% of the patients, and in combination with atrial septal aneurysm in an additional 11.3% of cases. Atrial septal aneurysm and atrial septal defect were diagnosed with equal frequency in 20.7% of our study population. Impulse conduction disorders were significantly more suggestive of interatrial septal anomalies than clinical signs and symptoms observed in our patients (84.91% vs 30.19%, P=0.002). Right bundle branch block was the most frequent impulse conduction disorder, found in 41 (77.36%) cases. We conclude that interatrial septal anomalies are highly associated with impulse conduction disorders, particularly with right bundle branch block. Impulse conduction disorders are more indicative of interatrial septal abnormalities in earlier stages than can be understood from the patient's clinical condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakalli et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Interatrial septal abnormalities and cardiac impulse conduction disorders (n=53). Impulse conduction disorders vs. Clinical signs and symptoms was evaluated on Indication of interatrial septal anomalies (p=0.002). Impulse conduction disorders were significantly more indicative of interatrial septal anomalies than clinical signs and symptoms (84.91% vs 30.19%, P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: