Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares macrocycles to acyclic molecules, revealing superior efficiency in organic photovoltaics, suggesting geometric design is crucial.
Here, we compare analogous cyclic and acyclic π-conjugated molecules as n-type electronic materials and find that the cyclic molecules have numerous benefits in organic photovoltaics. This is the first report of such a direct comparison. We designed two conjugated cycles for this study. Each comprises four subunits: one combines four electron-accepting, redox-active, diphenyl-perylenediimide subunits, and the other alternates two electron-donating bithiophene units with two diphenyl-perylenediimide units. We compare the macrocycles to acyclic versions of these molecules and find that, relative to the acyclic analogs, the conjugated macrocycles have bathochromically shifted UV-vis absorbances and are more easily reduced. In blended films, macrocycle-based devices show higher electron mobility and good morphology. All of these factors contribute to the more than doubling of the power conversion efficiency observed in organic photovoltaic devices with these macrocycles as the n-type, electron transporting material. This study highlights the importance of geometric design in creating new molecular semiconductors. The ease with which we can design and tune the electronic properties of these cyclic structures charts a clear path to creating a new family of cyclic, conjugated molecules as electron transporting materials in optoelectronic and electronic devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ball et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: