The X-ray crystal structures of 12 substrate-based peptidic inhibitors bound in the active site of the aspartyl protease, HIV-1 protease, have been compared. The inhibitor-binding modes of these inhibitors are remarkably similar despite their structural diversity and conformational flexibility. This prompted the design of a bicyclic peptidomimetic inhibitor 13 with macrocyclic components in constrained conformations that are preorganized for receptor-binding. This inhibitor is a consensus conformational mimic of the protease-bound inhibitor structures with superior properties to peptides, including stability to acid and peptidases as well as antiviral activity. Each of its 15- and 16-membered rings, formed through side-chain to backbone condensation, contains two proteolytically resistant amide bonds and either isoleucine or valine linked via a short aliphatic spacer to tyrosine. The two cycles are connected by a hydroxyethylamine transition state isostere. Molecular modeling and NMR studies indicate that each macrocycle is a highly constrained structural mimic of tripeptide components of linear peptide substrates/inhibitors of HIV-1 protease. Thus the bicyclic peptidomimetic superimposes upon and structurally mimics acyclic hexapeptide inhibitors and their analogues. This results in functional mimicry, as demonstrated by comparable inhibition of HIV-1 protease by acyclic and cyclic molecules at nanomolar concentrations. The rational design of cycles which fix receptor-bound conformations of these bioactive peptides has potential applications for the structural mimicry of other bioactive peptides and may facilitate rational drug design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reid et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: