There is a need to improve the quantity and quality of data in biodiversity monitoring projects. We compared an automated digital recording system (ADRS) with traditional methods (point-counts and transects) for the assessment of birds and amphibians. The ADRS proved to produce better quantity and quality of data. This new method has 3 additional advantages: permanent record of a census, 24 h/d data collection and the possibility of automated species identification. (WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN 34(1):211–214; 2006)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Acevedo et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: