PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2006Wildlife Society Bulletin224 citations

Using Automated Digital Recording Systems as Effective Tools for the Monitoring of Birds and Amphibians

View Full Paper
MAMiguel A. AcevedoLVLuis J. Villanueva-Rivera

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

There is a need to improve the quantity and quality of data in biodiversity monitoring projects. We compared an automated digital recording system (ADRS) with traditional methods (point-counts and transects) for the assessment of birds and amphibians. The ADRS proved to produce better quantity and quality of data. This new method has 3 additional advantages: permanent record of a census, 24 h/d data collection and the possibility of automated species identification. (WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN 34(1):211–214; 2006)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Acevedo et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6558d33caefa60660339cehttps://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[211:uadrsa]2.0.co;2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper