Key result
The event-driven hierarchical classification technique achieved an accuracy of 80.32% and extended wearable battery life by a factor of 2.60 compared to a full classifier.
Absolute Event Rate: 80.32% vs 83.26%
A novel event-driven classification technique for wearable ECG devices reduces energy consumption by a factor of 2.60 without compromising MI detection accuracy.
Supports low-energy wearables for ambulatory MI monitoring; extends event-driven ML validation in Level 2 human data.
A considerable portion of government health-care spending is allocated to the continuous monitoring of patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases, particularly myocardial infarction (MI). Wearable devices present a cost-effective means of monitoring patients' vital signs in ambulatory settings. A major challenge is to design such ultra-low energy devices for long-term patient monitoring. In this paper, we present a real-time event-driven classification technique based on the random forest classification scheme, which uses a confidence-related decision-making process. The main goal of this technique is to maintain a high classification accuracy while reducing the complexity of the classification algorithm. We validate our approach on a well-established and complete MI database (Physiobank, PTB Diagnostic ECG database). Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that our real-time classification scheme outperforms the existing approaches in terms of energy consumption and battery lifetime by a factor of 2.60, with no classification quality loss.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sopic et al. (2018) studied Myocardial Infarction (n=104). Event-driven hierarchical random forest classification technique vs. Full classifier using all available features was evaluated on Classification accuracy (Geometric mean of sensitivity and specificity). The event-driven hierarchical classification technique achieved an accuracy of 80.32% and extended wearable battery life by a factor of 2.60 compared to a full classifier.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: