Key result
Digital mobility measurement in PAH lacks standardization across instrumentation, reported outcomes, and interpretation.
Why the study?
Literature on measuring mobility in pulmonary arterial hypertension using digital technology needed examination across measurement methods, outcomes, disease-specific impacts, and measurement protocols.
While digital mobility metrics like step counts show promise for capturing real-world physical impairment in PAH, the field requires significant methodological standardization and validation before these tools can be robustly used in clinical settings.
Digital mobility measures should not yet guide PAH decisions; leaves open the need for validated, standardized protocols in research.
This review examined literature that has examined mobility in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) using digital technology. Specifically, the review focussed on: (a) digital mobility measurement in PAH; (b) commonly reported mobility outcomes in PAH; (c) PAH specific impact on mobility outcomes; and (d) recommendations concerning protocols for mobility measurement in PAH. PubMed, Scopus, and Medline databases were searched. Two independent reviewers screened articles that described objective measurement of mobility in PAH using digital technology. Twenty-one articles were screened, and 16 articles met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were reviewed. Current methodologies for mobility measurement in PAH with digital technologies are discussed. In brief, the reviewed evidence demonstrated that there is a lack of standardisation across studies for instrumentation, outcomes, and interpretation in PAH. The validity and reliability of digital approaches were insufficiently reported in all studies. Future research is required to standardise digital mobility measurement and characterise mobility impairments in PAH across clinical and real-world settings. The reviewed evidence suggests that digital mobility outcomes may be useful clinical measures and may be impaired in PAH, but further research is required to accurately and robustly establish findings. Recommendations are provided for future studies that encompass comprehensive reporting, validation, and measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robertson et al. (2024) conducted a review in Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Digital measurement of mobility was evaluated on Current methodologies, outcomes, validity, and reliability of digital mobility measurement in PAH. Digital mobility measurement in pulmonary arterial hypertension currently lacks standardization across studies for instrumentation, outcomes, and interpretation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: