Key result
Genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy cuts costs per unit of effectiveness ~59% versus empiric ticagrelor.
Why the study?
Antiplatelet resistance and associated stent thrombosis cause substantial healthcare costs, requiring pharmacoeconomic research into whether pharmacogenetic testing can reduce treatment costs in acute coronary syndrome.
Does pharmacogenetic testing-guided antiplatelet therapy improve cost-effectiveness compared to empiric therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome after PCI?
Does pharmacogenetic testing-guided antiplatelet therapy improve cost-effectiveness compared to empiric therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome after PCI?
Absolute Event Rate: 35577.4% vs 86080.99%
Pharmacogenetic testing for CYP2C19 prior to prescribing antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients after PCI can improve cost-effectiveness and reduce overall treatment costs.
Relevance. The problem of antiplatelet therapy resistance is not fully solved, whereas its manifestations in the form of stent thrombosis cause a negative contribution in treatment and can lead to significant economic damage to the healthcare system. Pharmacogenetic testing as a personalization tool can potentially reduce the cost of treatment, which requires pharmacoeconomic research of pharmacogenetic methods. The aim of this study was a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of the pharmacogenetic testing implementation before the antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods. In our study, a decision tree model was built with a time horizon of 1 year and a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed for six compared treatment strategies in patients with acute coronary syndrome after stent implantation with and without genotyping for the drugs clopidogrel, ticagrelor and prasugrel. Results. A treatment strategy with pharmacogenetic testing and the choosing of prasugrel for slow and intermediate metabolizers was the most preferred with CER 35 577.40 rubles per 1 unit of effectiveness. The most expensive strategy was the “blind” use of ticagrelor for all patients. Conclusion. Based on the modeling results, it can be concluded that the implementation of pharmacogenetic testing before prescribing antiplatelet drugs in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing stenting can potentially reduce the incidence of adverse events such as stent thrombosis and reduce the overall cost of treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Абдуллаев et al. (2023) studied Acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention (n=600). Pharmacogenetic testing (CYP2C19) guided antiplatelet therapy vs. Empiric antiplatelet therapy ('blind' ticagrelor, prasugrel, or clopidogrel without genetic testing) was evaluated on Cost-effectiveness ratio (CER). Pharmacogenetic testing to guide antiplatelet therapy, selecting prasugrel for slow and intermediate metabolizers, was the most cost-effective strategy with a CER of 35,577.40 rubles per unit of effectiveness compared to empiric use of ticagrelor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: