Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We investigated the utility of the fluorescent dye Deep Red Anthraquinone 5 (DRAQ5) for digital staining of optically sectioned skin in comparison to acridine orange (AO). Eight fresh-frozen thawed Mohs discard tissue specimens were stained with AO and DRAQ5, and imaged using an ex vivo confocal microscope at three wavelengths (488 nm and 638 nm for fluorescence, 785 nm for reflectance). Images were overlaid (AO + Reflectance, DRAQ5 + Reflectance), digitally stained, and evaluated by three investigators for perceived image quality (PIQ) and histopathological feature identification. In addition to nuclear staining, AO seemed to stain dermal fibers in a subset of cases in digitally stained images, while DRAQ5 staining was more specific to nuclei. Blinded evaluation showed substantial agreement, favoring DRAQ5 for PIQ (82%, Cl 75%-90%, Gwet's AC 0.74) and for visualization of histopathological features in (81%, Cl 73%-89%, Gwet's AC 0.67), supporting its use in digital staining of multimodal confocal micrographs of skin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ortner et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: