Key result
Bebulin™ was associated with significantly higher rates of successful international normalization ratio reversal (≤1.4) compared to Profilnine™ (P<.001).
Why the study?
While 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate products have been evaluated individually for emergent reversal of warfarin-associated bleeding, no study had directly compared the efficacy of the two products.
Does 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (Bebulin) improve the rate of achieving goal INR compared to Profilnine in patients requiring emergent reversal of warfarin-associated major bleeding?
Cohort
No
Does 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (Bebulin) improve the rate of achieving goal INR compared to Profilnine in patients requiring emergent reversal of warfarin-associated major bleeding?
In patients requiring emergent warfarin reversal, the 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate Bebulin provides significantly higher rates of successful INR reversal compared to Profilnine.
Bebulin achieved higher INR reversal rates than Profilnine in warfarin bleeding; this observational comparison leaves open whether product choice affects clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Current guidelines suggest that 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate is a possible alternative to 4-factor products for the emergent reversal of bleeding secondary to warfarin. While multiple observational studies have evaluated various forms of 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate individually, no study has compared the efficacy of the 2 products. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Bebulin™ and Profilnine™ for the emergent reversal of warfarin-associated major bleeding. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving both Bebulin™ and Profilnine™ at an urban, academic medical center with comprehensive stroke center designation and a neurosurgical center of excellence. All patients were treated at a single center that utilized a fixed, weight-based dosing protocol. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients in each group achieving a goal international normalization ratio of 1.4 or less. Median dose per kilogram of actual body weight was the same between the groups. When we assessed results by baseline™ international normalization ratio subgroup, more patients in the Bebulin™ group achieved goal when baseline values were 6 or less. No thrombotic events were documented in either group. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients treated with Bebulin™ experienced significantly higher rates of successful international normalization ratio reversal when compared to those who received Profilnine™. Further research is needed to determine the comparative efficacy between the 2 agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Warfarin-associated major bleeding. Bebulin™ vs. Profilnine™ was evaluated on Percentage of patients achieving a goal international normalization ratio of 1.4 or less (p=< .001). Bebulin™ was associated with significantly higher rates of successful international normalization ratio reversal (≤1.4) compared to Profilnine™ (P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: