Key result
Non-HDL-C criteria demonstrated higher sensitivity for identifying increased LDL-C compared to total cholesterol criteria (98.3% vs 80.8%) in schoolchildren.
Why the study?
Does non-HDL-C serve as a better cardiovascular risk screening tool than total cholesterol in schoolchildren?
Cross-Sectional (n=5,853)
Does non-HDL-C serve as a better cardiovascular risk screening tool than total cholesterol in schoolchildren?
Non-HDL-C is a more sensitive and accurate screening tool for cardiovascular risk and lifestyle-related diseases in children compared to total cholesterol.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-HDL-C may improve LDL-C detection sensitivity in schoolchildren; leaves open whether it should replace total cholesterol screening.
BACKGROUND: Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is now recognized as a strong predictive factor for cardiovascular disease in adults, but there have been few reports on non-HDL-C in children. METHODS: A total of 5853 4th and 7th grade schoolchildren were included in the screening for lifestyle-related disease from 2010 to 2011 in Takaoka City. The children underwent anthropometric measurements and non-fasting blood tests to measure total cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, triglyceride (TG), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). The relationship between percent overweight and each lipid level was analyzed, and children above the 97th percentile level with respect to both TC (220 mg/dL) and non-HDL-C (152 mg/dL) were compared and assessed. The relationship between non-HDL-C and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was also analyzed among 150 obese children. RESULTS: Non-HDL-C positively correlated with percent overweight and TG rather than did TC (r = 0.273, 0.360 vs 0.118, 0.179, all P < 0.001). In the screening using TC criteria, several subjects with increased HDL-C were miscategorized as hyperlipidemic, whereas none were miscategorized using the non-HDL-C criteria. The sensitivity of the identification of increased LDL-C was lower when the criteria for TC were used rather than the criteria for non-HDL-C (80.8% vs 98.3%). Among obese children, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome increased significantly and was accompanied by an increase in non-HDL-C (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Instead of TC, non-HDL-C would serve as a better and useful cardiovascular risk screening tool for lifestyle-related disease in school children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyazaki et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk (n=5,853). Non-HDL-C criteria vs. Total cholesterol (TC) criteria was evaluated on Sensitivity for the identification of increased LDL-C. Non-HDL-C criteria demonstrated higher sensitivity for identifying increased LDL-C compared to total cholesterol criteria (98.3% vs 80.8%) in schoolchildren.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: