Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To assess gingival health and predictors of relapse related to braided-wire bonded retainers after the active phase of comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Materials and methods Fifty-one subjects were recruited in a prospective study of whom 42 were available for analysis after 2 years of retention (pre-therapeutic ages 11–18 years; 66% female). A rectangular wire retainer (0.027 × 0.011″) was bonded to the mandibular incisors. Little’s index of incisor irregularity; intercanine width; the accumulation of biofilm, calculus and gingivitis; and the incidence of retainer detachment, were recorded. Subjects were examined before orthodontic therapy, upon therapy completion, and after 2 years of retention. Results The incidence of retainer detachment over the 2 years was 27%. The post-treatment incidence of irregularity was 17%, and intercanine width reduction was 24%. Calculus accumulation increased significantly during retention ( p < 0.001) but not the extent of gingivitis. A multiple logistic regression demonstrated that an increase of mandibular intercanine width by ≥3 mm correspondingly increased the odds of relapse 14.3 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–196.1; p = 0.046). Patients presenting with retainer failure were 10 times (95% CI 1.6–62.8; p = 0.014) more likely to experience relapse. Subjects who experienced relapse had retainer failure earlier than those without relapse (19 vs. 23 months; p = 0.003). The occurence of relapse was not related to a treatment change in incisor irregularity, the duration of treatment, the age of the patient, gender nor to a change of intercanine width during retention. Conclusion Post-treatment changes in the mandibular arch incorporating bonded retainers were not large, but were common. An increase in mandibular incisor irregularity during retention is mostly related to treatment-induced intercanine width expansion. The bonded retainer often detached and increased calculus accumulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ugrin et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: