Key result
Practice patterns regarding controversial situations in obstetric anesthesia were overall similar between academic and private practice anesthesiologists, with significant differences in only 8 questions.
Why the study?
Are there differences in practice patterns between academic and private practice anesthesiologists regarding controversial situations in obstetric anesthesia?
Cross-Sectional (n=207)
Yes
Are there differences in practice patterns between academic and private practice anesthesiologists regarding controversial situations in obstetric anesthesia?
Despite some differences in specific areas like preoperative testing and IV supplementation, practice patterns between academic and private obstetric anesthesiologists are generally similar.
Survey reveals practice variation in obstetric anesthesia; leaves open need for standardized, evidence-based protocols.
A survey consisting of 47 questions, 40 regarding clinical practice and 7 regarding demographics, was mailed to 153 directors of obstetric anesthesia in academic practice and to 153 anesthesiologists in private practice.Questions relating to the following areas of practice were asked: 1) preoperative laboratory testing; 2) preeclampsia and possible coagulopathies; 3) epidural catheter placement in women with "spinal problems"; and 4) use of epidural opioids and intravenous supplementation. Surveys were returned by 113 (74%) academic anesthesiologists and 94 (61%) private practice anesthesiologists. By univariate analysis, 14 questions showed a significant difference in response between those in academic and private practice, but only eight remained significant after accounting for the amount of clinical time currently devoted to obstetric anesthesia (>50% or <or=to50%). These eight questions related to preoperative laboratory testing in the healthy parturient, preoperative laboratory testing in the preeclamptic patient, and the use of intravenous supplementation during a cesarean section with regional anesthesia. Although there were some differences in the responses between anesthesiologists in academic and private practice, overall the responses were similar. (Anesth Analg 1996;83:735-41)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beilin et al. (1996) conducted a cross-sectional in Obstetric anesthesia practice patterns (n=207). Academic practice vs. Private practice was evaluated on Differences in survey responses regarding clinical practice. Practice patterns regarding controversial situations in obstetric anesthesia were overall similar between academic and private practice anesthesiologists, with significant differences in only 8 questions.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: