No explained variation (R 2 ) measure for ordinal response models enjoys wide use, and such measures have in fact received little specific attention or evaluation. To remedy this gap, the author presents and justifies R 2 O , an explained variation measure for ordinal response models, which is based on a recent ordinal dispersion measure. The use and function of R 2 O is illustrated, and the performance of it and other ordinal R 2 measures is compared via a series of simulated sampling and variable selection experiments. The R 2 O and a bias-adjusted version of it perform well in the simulation experiments and have a number of other advantages that make them attractive as measures of fit for any ordinal response model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael G. Lacy (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: