Introduction The efficacy of vildagliptin as an add-on to metformin has been demonstrated in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy, as well as in early combination therapy for newly diagnosed T2DM patients. However, there is limited evidence on the efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of vildagliptin sustained-release (SR) and metformin SR in these patient groups. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of an FDC of vildagliptin SR and metformin SR in patients with T2DM in real-world clinical settings across India. Methods A retrospective, multicenter, post-marketing study was conducted. Data from T2DM patients across 95 centers in India were collected and analyzed retrospectively. The study included adults (18-65 years) diagnosed with T2DM who were either newly diagnosed or inadequately controlled on existing therapy and were prescribed vildagliptin SR 100 mg and metformin SR 500/1000 mg FDC at the discretion of their treating physician. Primary outcomes assessed were reductions in HbA1c (%), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) from baseline to day 90. Results Data from 1,090 patients were included for analysis. The mean age of the patients was 54.46 years, and the mean baseline HbA1c was 8.19 ± 1.22%. The FDC of vildagliptin 100 mg SR and metformin 500 mg SR was prescribed to 89.26% of patients, while the FDC of vildagliptin 100 mg SR and metformin 1000 mg SR was prescribed to 10.73%. The overall study population showed a reduction of -0.81 ± 1.00% in HbA1c (p < 0.0001). Significant reductions in FPG of -28.61 ± 35.15 mg/dL (p < 0.0001) and in PPG of -42.32 ± 52.19 mg/dL (p < 0.0001) were observed. No serious adverse events were reported during the study. Conclusion The FDC of vildagliptin SR and metformin SR was effective, safe, and well-tolerated for managing T2DM in patients who were either newly diagnosed or inadequately controlled on other antidiabetic agents in Indian real-world settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: