Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article is a call for increased attention to the epistemological challenges in the scientific study of built environments. These issues are acknowledged, yet only superficially discussed, in the philosophy of architecture. While the philosophy of science has recently examined how environments shape human health, the specific problems raised by built spaces remain largely overlooked. However, it is crucial to address the epistemological foundations that underlie the ethical, aesthetic, social, and political dimensions of architecture. Evidence-Based Design illustrates this need: it aims to enhance scientific rigour in building design and improve performance. Based on a systematic review of design research, I argue that its methodological inspiration (Evidence-Based Medicine) is ill-suited to architectural contexts. A constructive update would incorporate insights from philosophy of science on experimentation, pluralism, and the role of theory in practical sciences. This case study exemplifies philosophical engagement with built environments and design research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas Bonnin (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: