Why the study?
To investigate the time course and reversibility of new-onset complete atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Observational (n=206)
No
While new-onset complete AV block occurs in 12.6% of TAVI patients, the majority recover, leaving a persistent rate of ~4% that is strongly predicted by deep implantation of oversized valves.
In this study, we aimed to investigate the time course of new-onset complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) and its reversibility after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We analyzed 206 consecutive patients without baseline CAVB who underwent successful TAVI. The incidence of new-onset CAVB was determined to be 12.6% (26/206). Among these patients, 14 recovered from CAVB within 2 weeks (6.8%, 14/206), while the remaining 12 (5.8%, 12/206) underwent permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion. Among the 12 patients who received the PPM, 4 were able to recover from CAVB within 4 months. Thus, only 8 among 206 patients (3.8%) showed persistent CAVB. Early-onset CAVB on the day of the procedure was the strongest predictor of PPM implantation (OR = 127). The electrocardiographic changes that occurred after TAVI were mostly recovered after 1 month. The most critical procedural factor that predicts CAVB and PPM insertion is the deep implantation (>4 mm) of a big valve (oversizing index >5.9%). In conclusion, the incidence of CAVB after TAVI was estimated to be at 12.6%. Two-thirds of these patients recovered from CAVB within 3 days, resulting in a final rate of persistent CAVB of 4%. To prevent CAVB, we have to implant an appropriate valve type with an optimal size and depth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cha et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (n=206). Early-onset complete atrioventricular block (on procedure day) vs. No early-onset complete atrioventricular block was evaluated on Permanent pacemaker implantation (OR 127.33, 95% CI 24.31-666.77).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: