OBJECTIVE: To determine whether rates and patterns of progression differ among primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) patients. METHODS: Fifty patients fulfilling clinical criteria for PLS were classified on initial presentation into three subtypes: ascending, multifocal, and sporadic paraparesis (PLS-A, PLS-M or PLS-SP). Patients were surveyed annually. Measures of movement speed, clinical rating scales, and transcranial magnetic stimulation were re-assessed at 1-5 year intervals for spread to additional body regions and progression of severity within affected regions. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients continued to fulfill criteria for PLS over a mean follow-up of 6.6 years, with a mean disease duration > 14 years. PLS-A patients had more predictable progression to additional body regions. Severity progressed faster in newly affected regions followed by stabilization in PLS-A or PLS-M subtypes. CONCLUSION: Clinical progression in PLS does not occur steadily, but has periods of faster decline upon spreading to a newly affected region. Classification of PLS patients by subtype is more relevant to predicting the spread of disease, but not progression of severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Floeter et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: