Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Article examines the WTO's fragmentation and geopolitics, suggesting pathways to restore multilateralism.
This article examines the current crisis of multilateralism amid escalating geopolitical tensions, technological disruption, and the fragmentation of global governance, with a particular focus on the World Trade Organization (WTO). It argues that the paralysis of the WTO Appellate Body (AB) represents not merely an institutional malfunction but a systemic shift away from rule-based multilateralism toward power-based and fragmented arrangements. The analysis situates this development within a broader transformation of the international order characterized by flexible alliances, increased reliance on plurilateral agreements, and diminishing consensus-based decision-making. It further underscores the growing importance of political risk assessment in strategic decision-making as global rules lose enforceability. Drawing on recent examples – including Peru-s experience in the WTO’s fisheries subsidies and e-commerce negotiations – the article concludes that restoring effective multilateralism requires institutional adaptation, flexible negotiation frameworks, searching alternatives to consensus and renewed political commitment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luis E. Mayaute Vargas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: