PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 26, 2026Journal of Cultural Economy0 citationsOpen Access

The nature that green finance can see: nature-related risk and the climatization of biodiversity

View Full Paper
SMSylvain MaechlerUniversity of Ottawa

Key Points

  • This paper explores the intersection of biodiversity and finance, focusing on how biodiversity can be integrated into the climate risk agenda.
  • Analyzed expert interviews and policy reports concerning biodiversity and finance.
  • Focused on the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures and the Network for Greening the Financial System.
  • Identified strategic and path-dependent pathways for integrating biodiversity into financial frameworks.
  • Biodiversity actors are increasingly replicating climate-risk models to make biodiversity more attractive to private finance.
  • Central banks are adapting existing climate analytical tools to incorporate biodiversity considerations.
  • Biodiversity is being reframed as ‘nature’ to better align with financial logics.

Abstract

This article examines why and how biodiversity enters finance through its alignment with the climate risk agenda, a process I conceptualize as the climatization of biodiversity. I argue that this development is rooted in the historical failure to financialize biodiversity due to its misalignment with the logics of finance, namely profitability and calculability, to which climate is more readily compatible. Drawing on expert interviews and analysis of policy and methodological reports, the article focuses on two key institutional sites: the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) and the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS). It identifies two pathways through which climatization unfolds. First, a strategic pathway, exemplified by the TNFD, involves a process of translation whereby biodiversity actors replicate climate-risk templates to render biodiversity attractive to private finance. Second, a path-dependent pathway, illustrated by the NGFS, reflects a process of extension through which central banks build on existing climate-based analytical tools to incorporate biodiversity. In both cases, biodiversity is reframed as ‘nature’ in an effort to align more closely with the logics of finance. In this sense, climatization functions as an emerging, though still unproven, route toward the financialization of biodiversity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sylvain Maechler (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a65a36cd3aea3239cd76999https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2026.2684485
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1From global diffusion to local semantics: unpacking the scientization of central banks2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity2015 · 151 citations
  3. 3The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism2001 · 706 citations
  4. 4Financialization and the Environmental Frontier2020 · 22 citations
  5. 5The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital1997 · 22,336 citations