Review synthesizes bridge scour evaluation techniques in the US, highlighting advancements and ongoing challenges.
This review paper provides a comprehensive synthesis of bridge-scour evaluation methods in the United States, tracing their evolution from the post-Schoharie Creek collapse development of HEC-18 to contemporary deterministic, field-based, numerical, stochastic, and machine-learning approaches. It examines the foundational empirical equations derived from laboratory flume studies, contrasts them with large-scale field investigations and region-specific envelope curves, and highlights recent advances in turbulence-resolved hydraulics, computational fluid dynamics modeling, and sediment-transport theory. The review also evaluates emerging probabilistic and data-driven frameworks, including Bayesian inference, decision trees, ensemble learning, and uncertainty-quantified scour prediction, that offer improved accuracy and risk-informed decision-making compared with traditional methods. Collectively, the findings underscore both the progress achieved and the persistent limitations in current scour appraisal practice, emphasizing the need for integrated, multidisciplinary, and probability-risk-based methodologies to support more reliable and cost-effective bridge-foundation design and system-level asset management. Finally, a technology roadmap is proposed to guide bridge administrators, engineers, the transportation industry, and researchers in advancing solutions to the persistent challenges of bridge scour.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Houng Li (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: