Evaluates an intelligent model to enhance decision-making in power system monitoring, suggesting improved analysis accuracy.
To address the challenges in remote monitoring of power system secondary equipment, including dispersed multi-source heterogeneous corpora, inconsistent terminology, non-standardized expressions, unstable knowledge granularity, and fragmented evidence retrieval, a knowledge-organized and retrieval-augmented intelligent decision-making model is proposed in this paper. First, heterogeneous textual resources, including defect records, standards and operating procedures, maintenance logs, typical cases, and abnormal operation reports, are transformed into retrievable, reusable, and traceable knowledge units through text cleaning, terminology normalization, semantic chunking, and metadata annotation. Monitoring issues are then uniformly represented and modeled as structured retrieval requests. A hybrid retrieval scheme is further developed by integrating keyword retrieval, vector retrieval, hierarchical index backtracking, and unified re-ranking. On this basis, an evidence-constrained retrieval-augmented output mechanism is introduced to generate structured results containing anomaly assessment, evidence-based interpretation, handling recommendations, and source traceability, thereby forming an intelligent auxiliary analysis workflow with expert-system-oriented support for duty-operation scenarios. Results show that the proposed model improves evidence retrieval over baseline retrieval settings and achieves better assisted-analysis performance than direct LLM output and conventional RAG. It effectively improves evidence matching accuracy, completeness of evidence organization, and stability of source traceability, indicating its scenario-level feasibility for intelligent auxiliary analysis and decision-support tasks in remote monitoring of power system secondary equipment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: