Analyzes hand-head positions and finger configurations in hemispherectomy individuals, suggesting variability overrides hemispheric specialization.
= 2 with a remaining right hemisphere (rRH)). Imitation performance was analysed with the NEUROGES®-ELAN system, considering error types and reaction times. Bayesian analyses revealed no group differences in performance scores, error types and reaction times for HP or FP imitation. The qualitative analysis of error types revealed group differences, particularly for FP imitation, with rRH individuals showing predominantly self-corrections, whereas rLH individuals showed diverse error patterns (e.g., position errors). However, considerable interindividual variability was foremost observed across imitation tasks and subtypes. Overall, the findings do not support a strict hemispheric specialization for HP and FP imitation following hemispherectomy. Rather, they highlight the importance of individual variability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ketter et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: