The replacement of petroleum‑derived acrylic binders with sustainable bio‑based alternatives is of increasing interest in water‑based flexographic inks; however, successful adoption requires preservation of storage stability and printed color fidelity. In this study, a bio-binder based on soy protein was evaluated as a partial and full replacement of a conventional acrylic emulsion binder in cyan water‑based flexography ink formulations for linerboard application. The soy replacement of 0–100 wt% in the let‑down ink vehicle were formulated and assessed for storage stability via pH and viscosity measurement over 60 days using a Zahn #2 cup efflux time. The physical properties ink, such as optical ink density and colorimetric performance (CIE L*a*b* and delta E 2000 (ΔE₀₀) color difference) were determined. All formulations maintained stable alkaline pH values (≈ 8.7–9.2) and consistent viscosity within the flexography printing operating window (≈ 25–28 s), indicating good chemical compatibility and resistance to viscosity shift. Optical ink density showed only minor, non‑disruptive changes across formulations. Colorimetric analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in L* or a* values, while modest formulation‑dependent shifts were observed in the b* coordinate at intermediate soy levels. Importantly, ΔE₀₀ values were below 2, a common perceptibility threshold, indicating negligible visual color differences relative to the acrylic control. The results demonstrated that soy protein bio-binder can replace acrylic binder across the full substitution range without compromising storage stability, press‑relevant viscosity, or printed color appearance. This work supports soy protein bio-binder as a sustainable alternative for water‑based flexography inks, enabling reduced reliance on petroleum‑based polymers and associated Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) emissions while maintaining performance required for packaging applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pingale et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: