Investigates asymmetric cost behavior in firms, suggesting environmental volatility drives these patterns.
Does asymmetric cost behavior require an uncertain environment to emerge? We study cost “stickiness” and “anti-stickiness”—the asymmetric response of costs to sales increases and decreases—as the output of a complex adaptive socio-technical system in which managerial cognition (the social subsystem) couples demand signals to committed resources and adjustment frictions (the technical subsystem). Because optimism and pessimism can arise only under uncertainty, expectation-driven asymmetry should be observed only once the environment is sufficiently unpredictable. Using 163,415 U.S. firm-year observations (1970–2012), with environmental uncertainty measured as firm-specific sales volatility relative to industry, we find that cost stickiness is statistically absent under low uncertainty and strengthens as uncertainty rises, whereas anti-stickiness is present across uncertainty levels and, on average, weakens as uncertainty increases. Both relations are non-linear, peaking at intermediate-to-high uncertainty, and an order-backlog test detects no statistically discernible expectation-driven asymmetry under low uncertainty. The evidence is consistent with environmental uncertainty acting as an enabling condition of expectation-driven adaptation, and shows that anti-stickiness is not the mirror image of stickiness—with implications for modeling coupled adaptive responses in organizational systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Connell et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: