Randomized trial analyzes mixing times and bounds for quantum Gibbs samplers, suggesting deeper implications for locality in sampling.
I study the mixing time of quantum Gibbs samplers (Davies / Chen– Kastoryano–Gilyén generators) at low temperature. I prove a locality lower bound: any local, KMS–detailed-balanced sampler whose target has an order- parameter bottleneck has an Arrhenius-small spectral gap, by a quantum Cheeger argument, and hence mixing time eΩ(β∆F). The bound is a quantum Cheeger argument and holds for every KMS–detailed-balanced sampler. The coherence cannot lift an order-parameter bottleneck, thereby the obstruction survives quantization. It is not, however, intrinsic to the target. I give a 3-local, detailed-balanced Lindbladian on an enlarged spin+bond register whose spin marginal realizes the Fortuin–Kasteleyn cluster update and which, for commuting ferromagnets, has an inverse-polynomial gap at every temperature and prepares σ in poly(n)log(1/ε) gates. This gives an unconditional separation from the local-reversible class in which locality (not coherence) is the operative resource. As a conjecture, I isolate the genuinely quantum question about cluster updates for noncommuting targets, where no nonnegative bond representation exists and the cluster must be grown coherently.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soo-Jong Rey (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: