Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Addendum clarifies binary distinction necessity and memory presuppositions in existence theory, implying deeper understanding.
D19 establishes that a reproducible distinction is the minimal tenable candidate for existence, and that instantaneous or featureless configurations are logically indistinguishable from nothingness. This addendum closes two gaps left open in D19: why the minimal distinction must be binary rather than admitting three or more states, and what must already be presupposed for a trace to constitute a memory rather than an isolated event. The argument proceeds entirely within the philosophical register of D19 and DN; no new physical or combinatorial result is claimed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cédric Laubscher (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: