Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates green investment impacts on supply chain resilience amid pollution risks, indicating strategic implications.
As emerging contaminant risks intensify, supply chains in pollution-sensitive industries have become increasingly uncertain and vulnerable. Containing pollution risk diffusion and enhancing supply chain resilience therefore constitute urgent theoretical and practical challenges. Based on inter-firm supply and demand relationships, this study constructs a network game model incorporating firm pollution sensitivity, economic exposure, and green investment. By comparing independent firm decision-making, homogeneous decision-making with network effects, and heterogeneous decision-making, this study conducts numerical simulations using data from 391 firms across six typical pollution-sensitive industries. The findings show that complementary business relationships alter the marginal returns to firms’ green investment and may induce free-riding-like strategic dependence under network externalities, thereby weakening preventive green investment incentives and increasing supply-chain network vulnerability. Firms’ green investment decisions are jointly driven by their own pollution sensitivity, potential economic losses, and partners’ risk exposure. Supply-chain topology further moderates the green investment–resilience relationship: when cooperation is limited, higher business concentration strengthens network resilience; when cooperation is intensive but structurally imbalanced, improving the green governance capacity of vulnerable firms and reducing structural asymmetry more effectively curb pollution-risk diffusion. These findings provide implications for stakeholders’ green governance and supply chain risk management decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: