PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 29, 2006Stroke51 citationsOpen Access

Combined Measurement of Carotid Stiffness and Intima-Media Thickness Improves Prediction of Complex Aortic Plaques in Patients With Ischemic Stroke

View Full Paper
AHAndreas HarloffCSChristoph StreckerMRMatthias Reinhard

Key Result

Combined measurement of carotid intima-media thickness and distensibility increased the negative predictive value for excluding aortic atheroma ≥4 mm to 98.2%, compared to 92.0% for IMT alone.

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=208)

Structured PICO

Does the combined measurement of carotid IMT and distensibility improve the prediction of complex aortic plaques in patients with ischemic stroke?

P
Population
208 stroke patients (mean age 60 years) undergoing transesophageal echocardiography for screening of aortic plaques.
E
Exposure
Combined measurement of intima-media thickness (IMT) and distensibility (DC) of the common carotid arteries by ultrasound
C
Comparator
Measurement of IMT alone or DC alone
O
Outcome
Prediction or exclusion of aortic thrombi or plaques ≥4 mmsurrogate

Combining carotid IMT and distensibility measurements significantly improves the negative predictive value for complex aortic plaques, potentially reducing the need for transesophageal echocardiography in stroke patients with normal carotid arteries.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 98.2% vs 92%

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We hypothesized that for the prediction or exclusion of aortic thrombi or plaques >or=4 mm, the combination of intima-media thickness (IMT) and distensibility (DC) of the common carotid arteries would be superior to the measurement of IMT alone. METHODS: We prospectively included 208 stroke patients (mean age, 60 years) undergoing transesophageal echocardiography for screening of aortic plaques. IMT and DC were determined by ultrasound, and DC was quantified by measuring blood pressure and the common carotid arteries diameter change on M-mode ultrasound during the cardiac cycle. RESULTS: Negative predictive values of IMT or=24x10(-3)/kPa for the exclusion of aortic atheroma >or=4 mm were similar (92.0% and 91.7%, respectively). However, negative predictive values increased to 98.2% and to 100.0% for the exclusion of aortic thrombi when both parameters were combined. Positive predictive values of IMT >or=0.9 mm and DC <24 were lower (46.3%, 41.1%; respectively), but they also increased in combination (54.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that IMT and DC represent different vessel wall properties and that measuring both parameters provides optimized characterization of carotid atherosclerosis. Combining IMT and DC increases the predictive power of carotid ultrasound, making transesophageal echocardiography dispensable for assessment of the aorta for those with normal carotid arteries and indispensable for those patients with carotid atherosclerosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harloff et al. (2006) conducted a cross-sectional in Ischemic Stroke (n=208). Combined measurement of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and distensibility (DC) vs. Measurement of IMT alone was evaluated on Prediction or exclusion of aortic atheroma ≥4 mm. Combined measurement of carotid intima-media thickness and distensibility increased the negative predictive value for excluding aortic atheroma ≥4 mm to 98.2%, compared to 92.0% for IMT alone.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a65a66af116a7026f338727https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000244763.19013.dc
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper