Key result
TTE serves as first-line cardiovascular imaging in pregnancy, reserving ionizing radiation for high-risk scenarios.
Why the study?
Physiological adaptations during pregnancy pose challenges for cardiovascular image acquisition and interpretation, necessitating a nuanced understanding to distinguish normal from pathological findings.
This review provides a practical framework for appropriate modality selection and interpretation of cardiovascular imaging in pregnant patients, emphasizing echocardiography as first-line and minimizing fetal radiation exposure.
Supports echocardiography-first imaging in pregnancy; leaves open need for prospective validation of CMR protocols.
Cardiovascular imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and longitudinal management of cardiovascular disease during pregnancy. Physiological adaptations-including increased blood volume, cardiac output, and chamber remodeling-pose important challenges for image acquisition and interpretation, necessitating a nuanced understanding of normal versus pathological findings. This review provides a practical, cardiology-focused framework for the use of imaging in pregnant patients with suspected or established cardiovascular disease. We emphasize key aspects relevant to cardiac imagers, including appropriate modality selection, pregnancy-adapted imaging protocols, and interpretation of findings in the context of dynamic physiological changes. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the first-line modality, while cardiovascular magnetic resonance offers complementary, radiation-free evaluation in selected cases. Imaging techniques involving ionizing radiation, such as computed tomography and invasive angiography, should be reserved for acute or high-risk scenarios and carefully optimized to minimize fetal exposure. We further discuss common diagnostic pitfalls, limitations of each modality, and areas of uncertainty, including the use of contrast agents and thresholds for advanced imaging. The importance of integrating imaging findings into multidisciplinary decision-making within Pregnancy Heart Teams is highlighted. By providing a structured, clinically oriented approach, this review aims to support cardiac imagers in delivering safe, accurate, and evidence-informed care to this complex patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berendoncks et al. (2026) conducted a review in Suspected or established cardiovascular disease during pregnancy. Cardiovascular imaging was evaluated. Cardiovascular imaging in pregnancy relies on transthoracic echocardiography as the first-line modality, while techniques involving ionizing radiation should be reserved for high-risk scenarios.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: