Uncovers self-leadership profiles in nurses, suggesting targeted training enhances coping skills.
Prior scholarship has largely adopted a variable-centered technique to investigate the relationship between self-leadership and coping style. Such an approach obscures individual heterogeneity and overlooks the configurational interplay of 6 distinct self-leadership strategies that can vary in both magnitude and form. To redress these limitations, this investigation employs latent profile analysis (LPA) to determine Chinese nurses’ self-leadership profiles and to explicate how each profile relates to coping styles. Participants comprised 340 Chinese nurses who provided self-report data on self-leadership strategies and coping style responses. LPA was conducted in Mplus 8.0; the binary coded hexadecimal procedure subsequently evaluated profile-based differences in coping. LPA yielded 3 self-leadership profiles (low, moderate, and high) in Chinese nurses. Active coping peaked in the high self-leadership profile with significant between-group differences, whereas avoidant coping showed only small, nonsignificant cross-profile differences. Distinct differences in coping styles are evident across the low, moderate, and high self-leadership profiles. In practical settings, profile-tailored self-leadership training integrated into the nursing curriculum equips each subgroup with targeted coping skills, thereby mitigating stress in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: