Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study compares radiographic and clinical outcomes of laminoplasty versus laminoplasty with facet fusion in cervical spondylolisthesis, suggesting improved stabilization with fusion.
Study Design: A retrospective observational study. Objective: To compare radiographic and clinical outcomes between laminoplasty alone and facet fusion with fixation in cervical degenerative spondylolisthesis. Background: The optimal surgical strategy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) with single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis remains controversial. Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight patients with CSM and single-level spondylolisthesis who underwent posterior cervical surgery between 2017 and 2025 were collected. Patients were divided into laminoplasty alone (L group, n = 14) and laminoplasty with facet fusion using lateral mass screw fixation (F group, n = 14). Radiographic parameters, including slip percentage (% slip), foraminal area, and disc height, were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes included Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores for neck and hand pain and numbness, and EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). Results: Both groups demonstrated improvement in pain and numbness after surgery, with no significant differences in clinical outcomes. However, the F group showed significantly greater radiographic improvement. Mean %slip improved from 20.5% to 4.8% postoperatively and was maintained at 5.6% at 2 years, whereas the L group showed progression from 16.1% to 22.6%. Foraminal area increased bilaterally, and disc height was preserved in the F group, while minimal changes and disc height reduction were observed in the L group. Solid bone union was achieved in all patients in the F group. Conclusions: Facet fusion combined with laminoplasty provides radiographic stabilization compared with laminoplasty alone in patients with single-level cervical degenerative spondylolisthesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dodo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: