Prospective trial evaluates cricopharyngeal myotomy's safety and efficacy in elderly patients, suggesting a promising treatment option.
Background and aims: Cricopharyngeal bar-related dysphagia predominantly affects elderly patients with significant comorbidity, in whom surgical myotomy carries substantial risk. Cricopharyngeal per-oral endoscopic myotomy (C-POEM) is an endoscopic alternative; however, data in elderly populations remain limited. We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of C-POEM in patients aged ≥70 years. Methods: This prospective study included patients aged ≥70 years who underwent C-POEM between March 2023 and October 2025. Symptoms assessed using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) at baseline, 4–6 weeks, and 3 months. Objective outcomes measured using EndoFLIP-derived distensibility index (DI) before C-POEM and 3 and 12 months post C-POEM. Technical success, clinical success, adverse events, length of stay were recorded. Results: Twelve patients (median age 79 years, IQR 76.5–83.3; median Charlson Comorbidity Index 6, (IQR 5–7) underwent C-POEM. Technical success was 100%. Clinical success was observed in all patients at 3 months; sustained at 12 month follow up. Median SSQ improved from 897 (IQR 686–1103) to 60 (IQR 20–269; p=0.001), and median UES DI improved from 1.6 (IQR 1.4–2.0) to 4.3 mm²/mmHg (IQR 3.6–5.2; p=0.001). Median length of stay was 3 days (IQR 2–4.5). No procedure-related major adverse events were observed. At a median follow-up of 55 weeks, symptomatic improvement was sustained. Conclusions: In this elderly cohort, C-POEM was feasible, safe, and associated with significant symptomatic and physiological improvement. These findings support C-POEM as a promising option for cricopharyngeal bar-related dysphagia in elderly patients. Larger comparative studies are required to define its role relative to established therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muwanwella et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: