Investigates Siglec-15's role in enhancing cisplatin resistance in cervical cancer, suggesting new therapeutic targets.
Chemoresistance constitutes a major cause of poor prognosis in advanced cervical cancer. Our previous studies have confirmed that Siglec-15 affects the progression of cervical cancer, whereas its role in regulating cervical cancer chemoresistance remains unexplored. This study investigates the role of Siglec-15 in cervical cancer chemoresistance and explores its mechanism. Siglec-15 expression and mitochondrial retrograde signaling levels were compared between parental and cisplatin-resistant cervical cancer cells. Lentiviral transfection was used to assess the functional effects of Siglec-15 modulation on the proliferation, apoptosis, and chemosensitivity of resistant cells. Further investigations were conducted to examine the effects of Siglec-15 on the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, mitochondrial membrane potential, reactive oxygen species levels, and the expression of retrograde-related proteins. These in vitro findings were subsequently validated in vivo using a xenograft tumor model through immunohistochemistry, Terminal-deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assays, and western blotting. The results showed that Siglec-15 was markedly upregulated in cisplatin-resistant cervical cancer cells, correlating with enhanced mitochondrial retrograde signaling. Siglec-15 overexpression promoted cisplatin resistance and mitochondrial retrograde signaling, driving proliferation while inhibiting apoptosis. Mechanistically, Siglec-15 regulated mitochondrial retrograde signaling through activation of the MAPK pathway, thereby enhancing chemoresistance in drug-resistant cells. Elevated Siglec-15 expression enhances cisplatin resistance in cervical cancer cells by activating the MAPK pathway to promote mitochondrial retrograde signaling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: