Analytical construction of SU(3)1 topological order in a chiral spin model on a honeycomb lattice, highlighting implications for future tensor-network investigations.
In this analytical mean-field study we construct and analyze a chiral SU(3) spin model on the bi- partite honeycomb lattice. Assigning the fundamental and antifundamental representations of SU(3) to the two sublattices, as required to form a singlet on every bond, together with the choice N = 3, fixes the on-site degree of freedom to a qutrit and the two-site coupling to the SU(3) Heisenberg exchange. By a standard representation-theoretic argument, the single-site reduced entropy equals ln 3 exactly in any finite-size singlet ground state. We show that the natural make-before-break ring exchange around a hexagonal plaquette must advance the site states by two positions to respect the alternation of conjugate representations, and that its time-reversal-odd part decomposes exactly into SU(3) scalar chiralities on the two sublattice triangles of the hexagon, leaving a one-parameter model. A fermionic parton mean-field analysis, with a single U(1) gauge constraint, places the parton bands at the Heisenberg point in a topologically trivial gapped state and shows, through an explicit Wick decoupling of the six-site ring exchange, that the chiral term generates a competing Haldane flux; enforcing the constraint self-consistently, the gap inverts beyond a finite coupling into a phase in which each of the three color bands carries unit Chern number. Integrating out the partons yields an SU(3)1 chiral spin liquid. The candidate phase carries total quantum dimension√3, three anyon sectors with Z3 fusion, chiral central charge two, and topological entanglement entropy ln √3. We present the exact operator identities as an algebraic foundation, and the SU(3)1 identification as a mean-field prediction, for future high-performance tensor-network investigations, which we identify as the necessary test of the proposed phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yohannes Dereje Alemayehu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: