Key result
A pre-injury prognostic score of 3/3 predicted that 90% of elderly patients with hip fractures remained independently mobile at discharge (95% CI 0.79-0.97).
Why the study?
Does a prognostic scoring system predict length of stay, rehabilitation progress, and discharge needs in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures?
Cohort (n=63)
Does a prognostic scoring system predict length of stay, rehabilitation progress, and discharge needs in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures?
A prognostic scoring system based on pre-injury ADL, comorbidities, and mental score can effectively predict rehabilitation outcomes, length of stay, and discharge needs in elderly patients with hip fractures.
May inform early discharge planning in elderly hip fracture patients; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
AIM: To evaluate a prognostic scoring system for elderly patients with hip fractures, which can, on admission, predict on the basis of pre-injury prognostic factors the possible length of stay in hospital, progress of rehabilitation, level of self-caring and rehousing needs at discharge. METHODS: A prognostic scoring system, developed on the basis of pre-injury level of independence in activities of daily living (ADL) (Katz), medical comorbidities and Pfeiffer's mental scoring system was used (Svensson O et al. J Bone Joint Surg 1996; B78: 115-8). The study was conducted on a cohort of 63 patients prospectively recruited from consecutive admissions. RESULTS: Ninety percent of the patients (without comorbidities and mental score > 7; group 3/3) who were independently mobile pre-injury remained independently mobile at discharge (CI 95% 0.79-0.97). Pre-injury score was found to be significantly related to the level of ADL at 2 weeks after operation and at discharge from hospital (CI 95% 0.69-0.9). There was a pattern in duration of hospital stay in different groups (score 3/3 = 22 days, 2/3 = 31 days and 1/3 = 33 days). A pattern of community placement and housing after discharge was noticed in relation to the pre-injury score. CONCLUSION: 3/3 score groups are most likely to achieve independence with mobility and ADL on the acute orthopaedic ward and to be discharged directly to their pre-injury homes. They also were the least likely group to need rehabilitation in a dedicated orthogeriatric rehabilitation unit. 2/3 score groups are most likely to benefit from rehabilitation in a dedicated orthogeriatric rehabilitation unit. 1/3 and 0/3 score groups are least likely to benefit from rehabilitation in a dedicated orthogeriatric unit, in terms of achieving independence with mobility and ADL. They were also the most likely group to need long-term high dependency residential care. Early liaison with social and community services is essential for effective and timely planning of discharge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashmi et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Proximal femoral fractures (n=63). Prognostic scoring system (pre-injury ADL, comorbidities, mental score) vs. Different score groups (0/3 to 3/3) was evaluated on Independent mobility at discharge (95% CI 0.79-0.97). A pre-injury prognostic score of 3/3 predicted that 90% of elderly patients with hip fractures remained independently mobile at discharge (95% CI 0.79-0.97).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: