This analysis explores the challenges and considerations in using AI and technology for identifying migrants, refugees, and displaced populations, emphasizing the need for an integrated approach that balances migration management and human rights. As threats like cyber insecurity and AI-based decision-making rise, the role of both state and non-state actors becomes essential in safeguarding rights while managing migration. While technology can enhance efficiency, as shown in Lebanon's response to the Tripoli bomb attack, it must adhere to international legal standards, especially privacy protections in the ICCPR and UDHR. The use of AI in identification processes raises concerns about wrongful identification, privacy breaches, and discrimination, especially when sensitive data is processed without human oversight. AI’s potential for errors in interconnected systems could lead to significant consequences, including denial of rights. AI’s readiness for sensitive contexts like border management is debated, with experts acknowledging the need for improvement in its ability to simulate human judgment. The UN supports responsible AI use in peacebuilding but stresses the importance of regulatory frameworks to address ethical risks like algorithmic bias. Ultimately, the paper advocates for human-rights centric approaches, relying on well-trained personnel to ensure that technology complements, rather than replaces, human involvement in migration management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Linda Cottone (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: