Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spectroscopic study demonstrates extended spin lifetimes in type-II two-dimensional perovskites, highlighting interfacial charge separation as a viable route for spintronic design.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Two-dimensional (2D) metal-halide perovskites with spin-dependent optical properties hold great promise for spintronic and quantum applications. However, their spin lifetimes, especially for n = 1 2D perovskites, are typically limited to subpicosecond time scales due to rapid spin relaxation driven by strong spin–orbit coupling (SOC), electron–hole exchange interactions, and phonon-mediated scattering. Here, we demonstrate that type-II ligand-perovskite heterostructures overcome these constraints by reducing electron–hole wave function overlap and exciton binding energy. Compared to the type-I 2D perovskite (PEA) 2 PbI 4 with a spin lifetime of 0.29 ps at room temperature, our engineered type-II systems achieve substantially extended spin lifetimes, ∼6.37 ps for (4Tm) 2 PbI 4 and ∼18.47 ps for (4TCNm) 2 PbI 4 . In both materials, spatial charge separation across the perovskite–ligand interface mitigates the Bir–Aronov–Pikus (BAP) mechanism. Temperature- and fluence-dependent measurements reveal Elliott–Yafet (EY)-dominated spin relaxation in (4Tm) 2 PbI 4, consistent with the observation of coherent phonon oscillation, whereas (4TCNm) 2 PbI 4 exhibits D’yakonov–Perel (DP)-dominated spin relaxation, with weaker phonon coupling further suppressing the EY relaxation, enabling spin lifetimes up to ∼126.81 ps at 5 K. Our findings establish a structural design framework for tailoring spin dynamics in 2D perovskites, offering a promising strategy to engineering spin and optoelectronic properties via rational ligand engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soni et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: