Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This randomized trial examines factors influencing regret in stock market simulations, indicating personality traits and prior regret matter more than trading style.
This study examines the determinants of post-simulation regret in a stock market exercise involving 133 second-year undergraduate management students. Using data from a four-hour trading simulation, it relates post-simulation regret to anticipated regret, portfolio return, trading-style indicators and personality traits. Five regression models are estimated with a common specification, each including a different proxy for trading style. The results show that anticipated regret is positively associated with post-simulation regret, while portfolio return is negatively related to regret and is significant or marginally significant across models. Conscientiousness also emerges as a significant positive predictor. By contrast, none of the trading-style proxies reaches standard significance levels. The findings suggest that regret in simulated trading is explained more by prior regret disposition, portfolio performance, and personality than by trading style.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Finet et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: