Experimental and finite element study evaluates sustainable ECC slabs for heavy-duty pavement, suggesting superior alternatives.
Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) represent a promising alternative to conventional rigid pavement concrete, offering superior crack-bridging performance. However, the structural-scale performance of sustainable ECC pavement slabs remains underexplored. This study investigates the development of a sustainable, cost-effective (ECC) utilizing Glass Fibers (GF) and Fly Ash (FA) for heavy-duty pavement applications. An experimental program evaluated nine ECC mixes with varying GF content (1%, 2%, 3%) and FA replacement levels (10%, 20%, 30%). Mechanical characterization through compressive strength, indirect tensile strength, flexural strength, deflection capacity, crack width, and elastic modulus testing revealed that FA 30% with GF 3% (S9) improved indirect tensile strength by 140%, while FA 10% with GF 3% (S3) enhanced flexural strength by 75%. Mix S6 (FA 20%, GF 3%), was selected as the optimal balanced mix due to its superior ductility, controlled micro-cracking, and higher cement replacement ratio. Following experimental validation of the numerical model, a parametric 3D ANSYS FEM study was conducted on 3x3m pavement slabs subjected to pseudo-static moving edge loads (40 kN and 80 kN) across varying thicknesses (50–150 mm). The numerical results reveal a systematic non-monotonic relationship between slab thickness and bottom tensile stress, governed by the radius of relative stiffness and consistent with Westergaard's edge loading theory. Substituting conventional concrete with mix S6 at a constant 50 mm slab thickness achieves equivalent structural performance to doubling the conventional slab thickness to 100 mm. These findings provide an integrated material-to-structure design framework for sustainable ECC rigid pavements under heavy vehicular loading.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elshahat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: