Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates multi-robot task allocation efficiency in obstacle-rich environments, highlighting DFGP's effectiveness.
Static multi-robot task allocation in obstacle-rich environments becomes more challenging as the problem size increases because trivial and contested assignments are typically addressed during the same planning process. This paper presents the computational depot-frontier growth partitioning (DFGP) framework for organising assignment decisions in static depot-aware multi-robot task allocation. In a centralised, full-information setting, DFGP expands depot-centred frontiers so that tasks exposed to a single frontier are absorbed in parallel, whereas only boundary tasks shared by multiple frontiers are resolved through entropy-based priority. Residual budget constraints limit frontier expansion, and the planning process is completed using dead-end recovery and bottleneck-oriented refinement. A benchmark evaluation across 18 scenarios encompassing six maps and robot counts of 5, 10, and 20 demonstrates that DFGP achieved an average lower-bound gap of 8.5%, compared with 20.4% for the strongest LKH-Minmax baseline, and attained the theoretical lower bound in six scenarios. In addition, DFGP also exhibits fixed-seed reproducibility with σ = 0, an allocation runtime of 1.3–2.5 s, and consistent lower-bound proximity across four maps in the 20-robot setting. Active construction indicators reveal that most assignments are absorbed uncontested, with frontier-based contested resolution and rescue confined to boundary cases; this resolution is most decisive in the intermediate-load regime, where task–robot competition is highest, whereas the headline gap reflects the combined effect of all framework stages. These results position DFGP as a benchmarked computational framework for obstacle-aware multi-robot planning that combines a low lower-bound gap with deterministic and practical execution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: