Systematic review evaluates chemotherapy efficacy in pediatric myoepithelial carcinoma, suggesting multimodal treatment to enhance outcomes.
Myoepithelial carcinoma (MEC) in pediatric patients is a rare and aggressive malignancy characterized by heterogeneous morphology and variable molecular features. The optimal role of chemotherapy remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines to evaluate chemotherapy in pediatric and young-adult patients with extra-salivary MEC. Twenty-one studies including 40 patients were analyzed. Chemotherapy response was evaluable in 19 patients, with partial responses in 57.9%, stable disease in 15.8%, and progressive disease in 26.3%; no complete responses were observed with chemotherapy alone. Comparable activity was found between TREP-based (ICpE) and sarcoma-like regimens, with no evidence of superiority of one regimen over the other, but supporting ifosfamide-based combinations as a therapeutic backbone. Radiotherapy and complete surgical resection were associated with improved local control. At a median follow-up of 21 months, 35% of patients were alive with no evidence of disease, while 37.5% had died of disease. Patients with EWSR1 rearrangements showed relatively favorable outcomes. Overall, chemotherapy demonstrates limited efficacy, and a multimodal approach remains essential. These findings highlight the need for international guidelines within the EXPeRT group to standardize management and improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salvi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: