Key result
Estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) models using clinical and anthropometric data showed good discriminative performance (AUC 0.81-0.89) for identifying individuals with lower MRI-assessed PWV (< 6.7 m/s).
Why the study?
MRI-assessed PWV is a prognostic marker for cardiovascular events, but whether clinical and anthropometric prediction models could enable indirect PWV assessment was unknown.
Can estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) based on clinical and anthropometric data accurately discriminate between lower and higher MRI-assessed PWV values?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,254)
Can estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) based on clinical and anthropometric data accurately discriminate between lower and higher MRI-assessed PWV values?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.81-0.89
Estimated pulse wave velocity using clinical and anthropometric data shows good discriminative performance for identifying individuals with lower PWV values and could serve as a gatekeeper for MRI-based assessment.
ePWV models may enable PWV estimation without MRI; leaves open external validation before clinical use.
Pulse wave velocity (PWV) assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a prognostic marker for cardiovascular events. Prediction modelling could enable indirect PWV assessment based on clinical and anthropometric data. The aim was to calculate estimated-PWV (ePWV) based on clinical and anthropometric measures using linear ridge regression as well as a Deep Neural Network (DNN) and to determine the cut-off which provides optimal discriminative performance between lower and higher PWV values. In total 2254 participants from the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity study were included (age 45–65 years, 51% male). Both a basic and expanded prediction model were developed. PWV was estimated using linear ridge regression and DNN. External validation was performed in 114 participants (age 30–70 years, 54% female). Performance was compared between models and estimation accuracy was evaluated by ROC-curves. A cut-off for optimal discriminative performance was determined using Youden’s index. The basic ridge regression model provided an adjusted R 2 of 0.33 and bias of < 0.001, the expanded model did not add predictive performance. Basic and expanded DNN models showed similar model performance. Optimal discriminative performance was found for PWV < 6.7 m/s. In external validation expanded ridge regression provided the best performance of the four models (adjusted R 2 : 0.29). All models showed good discriminative performance for PWV < 6.7 m/s (AUC range 0.81–0.89). ePWV showed good discriminative performance with regard to differentiating individuals with lower PWV values (< 6.7 m/s) from those with higher values, and could function as gatekeeper in selecting patients who benefit from further MRI-based PWV assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hout et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk assessment (n=2,254). Estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) prediction models vs. MRI-assessed PWV was evaluated on Discriminative performance for PWV < 6.7 m/s (AUC 0.81-0.89). Estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) models using clinical and anthropometric data showed good discriminative performance (AUC 0.81-0.89) for identifying individuals with lower MRI-assessed PWV (< 6.7 m/s).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: