Key result
The Cardio-toxicity Risk Score demonstrated a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI 0.78-0.92) and a negative predictive value of 97% (95% CI 0.90-0.99) for predicting cardio-toxicity in breast cancer patients.
Why the study?
Long-term cardiotoxic side effects of cancer treatments affect survival and quality of life, prompting evaluation of the ASCO Cardiotoxicity Risk Score to predict cardiotoxicity.
Does the Cardio-toxicity Risk Score (CRS) predict cardio-toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab?
Observational (n=413)
No
Does the Cardio-toxicity Risk Score (CRS) predict cardio-toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab?
May support CRS-guided monitoring in breast cancer; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Recent advances in the early detection and treatment of cancer have led to a significant improvement of cancer survival worldwide. However, long-term cardio-toxic side effects affect both patient survival and quality of life. Aim: To assess the utility of the Cardio-toxicity Risk Score (CRS) to predict cardio-toxicity among our patients. Material and Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study for 3 years in the first cardio-oncology unit in Morocco. For each breast cancer candidate to an adjuvant treatment with anthracyclines and/or trastuzumab, we calculated The CRS proposed by the ASCO, and classified the patients in 2 groups (high and low risk). We then performed sensitivity and correlation analysis between cardio-toxicity and the patients' CRS. Results: In total, 413 patients were included, and when applying the CRS to them, 136 (32.9%) were considered at high risk and 277 (67.1%) at low risk. During follow-up, 42 patients (10.1%) experienced cardio-toxicity. Sensitivity analysis showed that the CRS applied to our population had a sensitivity of 83% [95% CI: 0.78, 0.92], a specificity of 65% [95% CI: 0.54, 0.71], with a positive predictive value of 21% [95% CI: 0.08, 0.39] and a negative predictive value of 97% [95% CI: 0.90, 0.99]. On the other hand, correlation analysis found a significant positive correlation with both transient and permanent cardio-toxicity. Conclusion: The CRS demonstrated good sensitivity and negative predictive value for the development of cardio-toxicity in our population, suggesting that intensive cardiac monitoring may not have as much interest in low-risk patients that in high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study conducted an observational in Breast cancer (n=413). Cardio-toxicity Risk Score (CRS) vs. Low risk score was evaluated on Cardio-toxicity (Sensitivity 83%, 95% CI 0.78-0.92). The Cardio-toxicity Risk Score demonstrated a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI 0.78-0.92) and a negative predictive value of 97% (95% CI 0.90-0.99) for predicting cardio-toxicity in breast cancer patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: