Efficacy of CagriSema for Reaching Anthropometric Treatment Targets and Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Secondary, Post hoc Analysis of REDEFINE 1

Aims To assess the added value of absolute anthropometric targets alongside percentage weight loss in the clinical management of obesity. Materials and Methods The phase 3a, 68‐week REDEFINE 1 trial randomised adults without diabetes with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 , or ≥ 27 kg/m 2 with ≥ 1 obesity‐related complication, to once‐weekly CagriSema 2.4 mg/2.4 mg, semaglutide 2.4 mg, cagrilintide 2.4 mg, or placebo, plus lifestyle intervention. This secondary, post hoc analysis assessed the proportions of participants achieving BMI < 27 kg/m 2 and/or WHtR < 0.53 targets, and percentage weight loss by anthropometric target. The association between the proportion of participants maintaining or achieving normalisation of four cardiometabolic outcomes: normoglycemia (glycated haemoglobin < 5.7% and fasting plasma glucose < 5.6 mmol/L); blood pressure (< 130/80 mmHg); triglycerides (< 1.7 mmol/L); lipids (high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥ 1.3 mmol/L [female] or ≥ 1.0 mmol/L [male]) and reaching anthropometric targets or change in body weight (%) was also assessed. Results The proportion of participants achieving both BMI < 27 kg/m 2 and WHtR < 0.53 targets at week 68 was 30.3%, 19.1%, 9.0%, and 3.3% in participants who received CagriSema, semaglutide, cagrilintide, or placebo respectively. Both BMI and WHtR performed similarly as indicators for all four cardiometabolic outcomes. At more stringent cut‐off values, anthropometric targets were better measures than percentage weight loss. Conclusions The proportion of participants achieving anthropometric targets was greater with CagriSema Versus other treatments. These findings support further validation of BMI and WHtR anthropometric treatment targets and indicate a potential for indicating amelioration of clinical outcomes in obesity and a greater emphasis on target‐based treatment strategies.