This analysis reveals how different voting rules impact majority influence in multi-winner elections, suggesting potential risks for minority representation.
In multi-winner elections, the goal is to select a pre-given size committee of members from a given set of candidates. We define the concept of T-power of a majority-group of voters (Total majority-power or Total tyranny-power) as the ability of the group to guarantee, under a given voting rule, that all the committee members belong to its favorite candidates, regardless of the preferences of the other voters. In this case, we say also that such a voting rule is exposed to T-power. This situation can be considered extreme and worrying in democracy. In this paper, we examine the T-power under classes of multi-winner scoring rules. We focus on some common rules, and it turns out that BLOC rule ( k - k -Approval) is totally exposed to T-power, that is, any majority-group of any size has T-power under this rule. On the other hand, CCR, k -Plurality and k -Inverse-Plurality rules are almost notexposed to it, that is, no majority of any size has T-power. These last rules may provide some protection for minority groups in the sense of preventing T-power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhammad Mahajne (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: