This article explores disrupted individuation in post-COVID adolescents with school refusal, suggesting new clinical insights.
Background The post-COVID surge in school refusal has prompted a clinical response overwhelmingly focused on anxiety and its treatments. While this orientation is scientifically grounded, it remains partial: it fails to account for a dimension that successive lockdowns massively disrupted without the recent literature fully integrating it, namely the separation-individuation process (SIP) specific to adolescence. Aims This article proposes a complementary and integrative reading of post-COVID school refusal, organized around three axes. Approach First, lockdowns interrupted the environmental conditions necessary for the SIP to unfold, producing a developmental regression whose extent was revealed upon the return to school. Second, the hyperdigitalization that followed the lockdowns offered adolescents a substitution space enabling pseudo-separation without genuine individuation, durably impeding the process. Third, internal working models of attachment constitute the vulnerability substrate within which these impediments take hold. Findings A clinical vignette illustrates these articulations through a composite case of an adolescent whose partial school refusal is reread as an attempt to regulate a disrupted SIP rather than as an anxiety symptom to be reduced. Conclusions The article argues for a non-pathologizing reading of school refusal and opens research perspectives on the relationship between autonomy, attachment, and digital practices in adolescence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
G. Brandibas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: