Key result
A nurse-led digital clinical pathway for atrial fibrillation cardioversion improved guideline adherence, reduced walk-through times, and increased patient satisfaction from 8.7 to 9.1 (P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does a digital clinical pathway with a nurse-coordinator improve guideline adherence and reduce walk-through times in patients undergoing elective electrocardioversion for atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=700)
No
Does a digital clinical pathway with a nurse-coordinator improve guideline adherence and reduce walk-through times in patients undergoing elective electrocardioversion for atrial fibrillation?
A nurse-led digital clinical pathway for elective electrocardioversion improves guideline adherence, reduces walk-through times, and increases patient satisfaction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nurse-coordinated digital pathway may enhance guideline adherence for elective AF cardioversion; leaves open whether benefits extend to outcomes in randomized settings.
BACKGROUND: Clinical pathways attempt to increase efficiency by organizing the care-delivery process into individual analyzable steps. However, full advantage may only be taken if the process is governed by a "process care taker." Currently, new opportunities are emerging for nurses to become involved as health care experts and may become an intermediate between patient and clinical team. We evaluate a digital clinical pathway for electrocardioversion in atrial fibrillation with a nurse-coordinator in the ongoing consecutive experience in clinical practice. METHODS: The introduction of a digital pathway into the hospital information system allows continuous surveillance of clinical outcome indicators as well as variance indicators. This article describes a service evaluation and the implementation and effects of introducing a clinical pathway. However, when comparing the 2 eras, the primary goals were improved guideline-adherence and reduced walk-through times in the 600 consecutive pathway patients versus 100 consecutive control patients. RESULTS: The pathway was launched in January 2008. Up to January 2009, 600 all-comer, elective patients were treated using this integrated digital clinical pathway, without exception. Treatment and outpatient check-up appointments are made immediately for all patients. The pathway enabled the cardiologist to complete the risk calculator and drug therapy recommendations significantly better when compared with control patients and also reduced walk-through times significantly. Patient satisfaction rose from 8.7 to 9.1 (P < 0.01) using the pathway. CONCLUSIONS: A nurse-led clinical pathway for cardioversion patients is safely and efficaciously introduced in a teaching hospital. The pathway improved guideline-adherence. These results emphasize the importance of a nurse-coordinator who is an intermediary between atrial fibrillation patients and the clinical care team.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valente et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=700). Digital clinical pathway with a nurse-coordinator vs. Standard care (historical control) was evaluated on Guideline-adherence and walk-through times. A nurse-led digital clinical pathway for atrial fibrillation cardioversion improved guideline adherence, reduced walk-through times, and increased patient satisfaction from 8.7 to 9.1 (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: