Key result
Rosuvastatin 40 mg yields greater coronary atheroma regression than atorvastatin 80 mg.
Why the study?
Does rosuvastatin 40 mg compared to atorvastatin 80 mg improve coronary atheroma regression in patients with coronary artery disease?
RCT (n=1,039)
Does rosuvastatin 40 mg compared to atorvastatin 80 mg improve coronary atheroma regression in patients with coronary artery disease?
In patients with coronary artery disease, potent statin therapy promotes coronary atheroma regression, with higher baseline atheroma volume independently predicting greater regression.
AIMS: Statins can inhibit the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. We aimed to characterize clinical factors that associate with differing measures of coronary atheroma volume following potent statin therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: SATURN employed serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to monitor changes in measures of coronary atheroma burden [total atheroma volume (TAV) and per cent atheroma volume (PAV)] in 1039 patients with coronary artery disease, treated with rosuvastatin (40 mg) or atorvastatin (80 mg) daily for 24 months. Rosuvastatin-treated patients demonstrated greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C, 47 vs. 40%, P < 0.001) and greater increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C, 13 vs. 10%, P = 0.02). These alterations in the lipid profile associated with greater TAV (-6.4 vs. -4.4 mm(3), P = 0.01), but not PAV (-1.22 vs. -0.99%, P = 0.17) regression. Greater TAV reductions with rosuvastatin vs. atorvastatin occurred in patients with diabetes (P = 0.01, treatment by diabetic status interaction P-value 0.05). Greater PAV reductions with rosuvastatin were evident in females (P = 0.01, treatment by sex interaction P-value 0.03) and in those with greater than or equal to median baseline LDL-C (P = 0.02, treatment by LDL-C group interaction P-value 0.03) or HDL-C levels (P = 0.02, treatment by HDL-C group interaction P-value 0.04). On multivariable analysis assessing change in TAV and PAV, both higher baseline TAV and PAV independently associated with TAV and PAV regression, respectively (standardized estimates: TAV -0.25, P < 0.001; PAV -0.23, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Higher-risk patients, particularly those with greater baseline coronary atheroma volume, are more likely to experience less disease progression with potent statin therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puri et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in coronary artery disease (n=1,039). Rosuvastatin vs. Atorvastatin (80 mg daily) was evaluated on change in total atheroma volume (TAV) (p=0.01). Rosuvastatin 40 mg daily resulted in greater regression of total atheroma volume compared to atorvastatin 80 mg daily (-6.4 vs. -4.4 mm3, P=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: