Key result
Review introduces a systematic algorithm and AF-BREACH criteria to investigate breakthrough ischemic stroke in AF.
Why the study?
Ischemic strokes can still occur in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation despite appropriate DOAC anticoagulation.
This review provides a framework and standardized criteria (AF-BREACH) for investigating and managing breakthrough ischemic strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation on appropriate anticoagulation.
Highlights gaps in breakthrough stroke management on DOACs; leaves open optimal strategies pending trials.
Ischemic stroke is a serious complication of atrial fibrillation that is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. For patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, treatment with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) is first line treatment for stroke prevention. Ischemic strokes can still occur, however, despite appropriate anticoagulation—an event known as a breakthrough stroke. In this review, we provide an examination of breakthrough stroke through its epidemiology, mechanisms by which breakthrough strokes happen, and a framework for classification. We then propose a systematic, stepwise algorithm to investigate breakthrough stroke, including standardized criteria to identify an ideal population for future clinical trials using the AF-BREACH criteria (Atrial Fibrillation related BReakthrough Embolic Stroke despite appropriate anticoagulation without alternative Cause identified). Lastly, we discuss the emerging evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lun et al. (2026) conducted a review in Breakthrough ischemic stroke in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. This review proposes a systematic algorithm to investigate breakthrough ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation and introduces the AF-BREACH criteria to identify ideal populations for future trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: