Reveals employees' perspectives on ESG practices are more informative than existing ratings, suggesting valuable insights for investors.
This study evaluates whether employees have useful information about firms’ ESG (environmental, social, governance) practices. Analyzing over 10 million employee reviews, it reveals that 43% of reviews discuss ESG topics, with governance surprisingly receiving substantial attention. Assembling novel hard-to-manipulate ESG indicators, including emissions estimates from satellite imagery, the study finds that employees’ ESG inside view is more informative about these indicators than existing ESG ratings. Moreover, the inside view appears robust to ESG cheap talk, as low-cost changes in firms’ ESG commitments do not affect it, whereas costlier changes do. Thus, employee perspectives can help investors assess firms’ authentic ESG performance. This paper was accepted by Will Cong, finance. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.07258 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoa Briscoe-Tran (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: